The pie chart presents the proportion of seven types of films won Oscar prize in two period years 2003 and 2008.
As it can be seen from the chart, the largest proportion of the Oscar winners by film genre was thriller. At the first period of time, the proportion of thriller was just under a half (45%) and it decreased to nearly a third in 2008. Despite the dropping in the proportion, thriller film was still the number one when it comes to the Oscar winning film genres in 2003 and 2008. The second largest proportion was action. In 2003, its proportion accounted for almost a quarter. After that in 2008, its proportion increased to just under a third. While the proportion of comedy ( the least proportion of film genre won the Oscar) remained the same; the proportion of either horror or science fiction rose by a half. The documentary and romance films saw the least change in the proportion ( just increased by 1% or 2%)
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: TSEB
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart presents the proportion of seven types o...
^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y film genre was thriller. At the first period of time, the proportion of thriller was just un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 45% and it decreased to nearly a third in 2008. Despite the dropping in the pro...
^^
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a third. While the proportion of comedy the least proportion of film genre won t...
^^
Line 2, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s saw the least change in the proportion just increased by 1% or 2%
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56024096386 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45577075211 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524096385542 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9323566595 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28494490585 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129490693933 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102409625463 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2617896733 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294297452632 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.