The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie graphs depict the total electricity produced from five different sources of fuel in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000. Overall, coal energy made up the majority of the total production in Australia, while nuclear energy production drastically increased in France.
In Australia, the original units of coal were just 50 before rising nearly three times (130) four decades later. Hydro power energy experienced the same trend as its units increased from 20 to 36 at the end of the period. The units of natural gas and oil rapidly declined after 40 years, from 20 and 10 at first to 2 in 2000, respectively.
In France, nuclear power seemed to take up significantly more of the energy industry as its units rose from 15 to 126. In comparison, oil units slightly increased from 20 to 25, while coal units still remained at 25 over the years. Hydro power seemed to be no longer used, while the units of natural gas noticeably fell to approximately 2 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Blackcytrus | 74 | view |
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA 1970 2000 Marital status of adult Americans 1970 2000 73
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart shows the change in forested land in different regions of the world over time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA 1970 2000 Marital status of adult Americans 1970 2000 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74556213018 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64007462922 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.9732775379 43.030603864 28% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172786285831 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804966919223 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727098214926 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128249125245 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069528820985 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.