Given are the pie charts delineating electricity production units by fuel source in Australia and France in the period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000.
Perceptibly, coal hosted the highest fuel source in producing electricity over the period. However, Australia didn't have nuclear power source, while France had.
Remarkably, the highest fuel source to produce electricity in Australia - coal - accounted for 50 units, half of the total in the first year. This figure surged significantly by 80 units in the ensuing 20 years. Hydro power and natural gas both archived 20 units and oil source with 10 units in 1980, however, while hydro power witnessed a slight upswing of 16 units, natural gas and oil diminuted gradually to 2 units in the end of the period.
As for France, nevertheless total production was 10 units less than Australias' in 1980, France was 10 units more than Australia in 2000. Outstandingly, France had nuclear power, but Australia not. Nuclear power source just constituted 15 units of the total in 1980, then it nudged up at somewhere in the vincinity of three forth of the total fuel sources using for electricity producetion in 2000. Both coal and natural gas remained stably. Although oil and hydro power recorded respectively with 20 units and 5 units in 1980, these figures experienced plunges by 18 units for the former and 7 units for the latter.
- Task 1 The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie charts delineating electricity ...
^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ity over the period. However, Australia didnt have nuclear power source, while France...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95670995671 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70677001536 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6597792168 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281247752308 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122604423361 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977908239623 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220655716396 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105089718099 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.