The pie charts compare home ownership and renting for 1991 and 2007 in percentage terms. In 1991,
home owner were the most popular type of housing, accounting for 60%, or more than over half of all
homes. The next largest sector was social rented homes, amounting to 23% or nearly one-third of
homes. The remaining homes were mostly privately rented (11%) with a tiny fraction being social
housing (6%).
Sixteen years later, in 2007, the number of home owners had risen to 70%, or almost three quarters
of all homes. This was an increase of 10% compared with 1991. Much of the increase in home
ownership can be explained by the decrease in social rented homes, which had dropped from 23% to
17%.
The percentage of privately rented homes had remained unchanged at 11%. However, there were 5
million more homes in 2007 compared with 1991 so the number of rented homes had increased despite
the same percentage. Social housing has decreased three-fold from 6% in 1991 to 2% in 2007, and it
remains the least popular type of housing.
The pie charts compare home ownership and renting for 1991 and 2007 in percentage terms. In 1991,
home owner were the most popular type of housing, accounting for 60%, or more than over half of all
homes. The next largest sector was social rented homes, amounting to 23% or nearly one-third of
homes. The remaining homes were mostly privately rented (11%) with a tiny fraction being social
housing (6%).
Sixteen years later, in 2007, the number of home owners had risen to 70%, or almost three quarters
of all homes. This was an increase of 10% compared with 1991. Much of the increase in home
ownership can be explained by the decrease in social rented homes, which had dropped from 23% to
17%.
The percentage of privately rented homes had remained unchanged at 11%. However, there were 5
million more homes in 2007 compared with 1991 so the number of rented homes had increased despite
the same percentage. Social housing has decreased three-fold from 6% in 1991 to 2% in 2007, and it
remains the least popular type of housing.
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 78
- The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodit 67
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1 and 2007 in percentage terms. In 1991, home owner were the most popular type of...
^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g for 60%, or more than over half of all homes. The next largest sector was socia...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amounting to 23% or nearly one-third of homes. The remaining homes were mostly p...
^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 11% with a tiny fraction being social housing 6%. Sixteen years later, in 200...
^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d risen to 70%, or almost three quarters of all homes. This was an increase of 10...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with 1991. Much of the increase in home ownership can be explained by the decrea...
^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted homes, which had dropped from 23% to 17%. The percentage of privately rented...
^^^
Line 10, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... unchanged at 11%. However, there were 5 million more homes in 2007 compared with...
^^^
Line 11, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of rented homes had increased despite the same percentage. Social housing has ...
^^^
Line 12, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld from 6% in 1991 to 2% in 2007, and it remains the least popular type of housin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30675337024 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9399355762 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.61388408961 0.215688989381 285% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254045259281 0.103423049105 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16581378413 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233173294024 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152460039748 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.