The pie charts illustrate how people in Canada and Australia access the news.
Overall, it is evident that the share of each different category is made up differently in the two nations. However, to be specific, TV and online were consistently been the priority choice for Canadians and Australians to access the news, meanwhile, the others method were less popular in those countries.
Looking at the charts more closely, one can recognize that, in Canada, the majority of people used TV as their main way to update news, accounting for 40 percent. Followed by online news, representing about 36 percent. A similar trend was also seen in Australia, while the share of online news and TV, which regarded as the most popular ways of getting the news. Holding about 52 percent and 37 percent respectively, their combination made up more than four-fifths of the total. On the contrary, the share of radio and not specified ways, hitting the low among five distinguishing categories. Specifically, in Canada, they accounted for 7 percent and 3 percent in the order given, and both made up 2 percent in Australia. In addition, in Canada, the figures for print news comprised 14 percent. Meanwhile, in Australia, it just represented half of what it did in Canada.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six month period in 2011 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ians to access the news, meanwhile, the others method were less popular in those count...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97156398104 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85471761068 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616113744076 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0937247627 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188514693976 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831348850596 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875435918499 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168900995696 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114667009651 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.