The pie charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates, students level in three categories namely, unemployment, employment, and further education, after finishing the secondary education in Australia over three decades. Units are measured in percentage.Overall, level of employment in every year was growing dramatically, whereas, unemployment among Australian students was decline in every year.
In 1980,students who choose to go for higher education was 50% in contrast to the other years such as 38% and 37% in 1990 and 2000 respectively. 40 percentage of students entered into the employment in 1980, whereas, 10% of them are under unemployment.
An account of Australian students in employment was about 50% in 1990 which was 5% below as compared to 2000, which was 55%. Similarly, slight decrease in the percentage of students who went to tertiary education from 38% to 37% in over 10 years period. Furthermore, unemployment level of students also makes down in given period such as, 12% to 8% significantly.
- The charts below reveal the differences in reasons that motivated students to choose a college or university in the UK in 2008 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 73
- The governments should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on even if they are unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere . To what extend do you agree with this view. 78
- Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...cades. Units are measured in percentage.Overall, level of employment in every year was ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41290322581 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35988454289 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1492884134 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0486163330728 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239593677701 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316746408257 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348435093348 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321230342482 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.