The pie charts show a comparison of different kynds of energy production in france in 2 years.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of five different energy types in France in the years 1995 and 2000. Overall, coal and gas were the mist popular types of energy in France in both years.
The coal accounted for almost a third, remained relatively constant in both years. Similarly, the production of gas was 29.63% in 1980, experienced an insignificant growth (30.31%) in 2005. In contrast, energy contribution from petrol decreased from 29.27% in 1995 to 19.55% in 2005.
Nuclear energy comprised of 6.40% of total energy production in 1995, experienced a growth of almost 4% in 2005. With regards to other energy, there were almost 5% produced in 1995, before increasing to 9.10% after 10 years.
In conclusion, although other sources and nuclear energy surpassed energy production than 1995, the petrol contribution went down by almost 10% with in a decade.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 84
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 61
- Some people believe all the wild animals should be protected while others think only some animal need to be saved Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- Some people argue that all governments should spend a good amount of money for space researches. But some others argue that this money should be spent for meeting the basic needs on earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
- The line graph gives information about how people in the united kingdom spend their income 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, third, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72570693181 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2379000772 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.75 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254144713143 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114581440957 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844879784556 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160155344553 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092529741353 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.