The given illustration A provides information about health center in 2005 and plan B presents the same territory in the present day.
As can be seen in the plans, entrance location was moved from South to West side of building. In 2005, if you walked straight from the entrance, at the of corridor you would reach reception desk, while seats were on your left side. In the present days, when entering the house, reception is right away on your left and in front of reception desk is a children's play area. Seats were moved to East side of corridor. It is interesting to note, that new minor operations room was built near psysiotherapy room in the North side of health center.
What is more, office is in the same place as it was. Besides that, the room CR2 was replaced by room CR4, although, room CR3 was moved from south-west corner to South-East corner instead of area CR1. In addiotion to this, areas CR1 and CR2 now are smaller than they used to in 2005 and now arranged among children's play area and room CR3.
The pictures clearly shows, that car parking spaces were considerably increased from 12 to 30 spaces, owing to the fact that garden was reduced.
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 56
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time excluding email Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the Uk 2000 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 87
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60765550239 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40784452442 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8863118243 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122481305514 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585033536052 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10281176662 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108193443322 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140889803862 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.