The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates a consider change in a harbor between 2000 plan and current plan.
It is obvious that the majority of harbor consist of land located southern section in map. In addition, there are numerous changes in building of west in current plan.
As can be seen, there are some cases without any change such as car park that located in under showers and toilets in both maps, lifeboat, the access road to lifeboat, and public and private beach. Noy only does the castle is changed of use to hotel but also, fishing boats, and marina replaced with each other. However, a cafés and shops building are constructed near to lifeboat at the left corner and a path way to access the hotel, and showers and toilets above bigger car park and a dock next to the previous version. The bigger car park changes the entre to main road.
In conclusion, the new porth harbour has more facilities and accessible roads which seems better than its pervious version in 2000.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plan seems to be countable, so consider using: '2000 plans'.
Suggestion: 2000 plans
...s a consider change in a harbor between 2000 plan and current plan. It is obvious that t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a café' or simply 'cafés'?
Suggestion: a café; cafés
...rina replaced with each other. However, a cafés and shops building are constructed near...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67251461988 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26342232162 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8487465035 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751756298498 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416017697502 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509741989492 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678983082022 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594207456304 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.