The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The picture illustrates how a public park has changed after its establishment in 1920 till present time.
Overall, the park has experienced considerable changes in terms of facilities and architectural features.
Firstly in 1920 the park had five different seats in every corner of that which have been reduced to four seats now and they have surrounded a big rose Garden in the center of the park. Two main entrance from Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street have remained unchanged during the time but a new entrance for cars has been built in the underground. There was a pond for water plants in one corner of the park in 1920 which then was replaced with area for children to play.
In the right side of Elden Street entrance was a greenhouse that was demolished in present time in order to build a water feature. Furthermore, the left side of the park used to be a rather small stage for musician that now is replaced with an amphitheater for concerts which has seats for audiences. There is no longer a fountain in center of the park since it is replaced with a bigger rose garden that is surrounded with seats.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64141414141 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60485153223 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.631221019 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131444372832 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633670288852 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416618792763 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939043725926 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275447097887 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.