The depicted picture is a clear illustration of the changes having been done from 1920 until now. Overall, a massive construction took place over the period, and numerous facilities have been added and disappeared.
In the picture of 1920, a fountain adjacent to musician stages is seen at the center of the picture. In the southeast of the map, the glasshouse is located opposite the pond used for water plans. The five seats are spread around the garden park's yard, and also three rose gardens exist on the depicted map.
However, a big rose garden has been replaced in the former fountain place, and also it has been surrounded by four seats. All the former seats and two of rose gardens, and plus musician stages are demolished to make room for the construction of a cafe and an amphitheater which the latter is used for concerts. Many changes are done on the east side of the site; the former pond and glasshouse are replaced by a children's play area and a water feature, respectively.
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70689655172 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59709712233 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6510093635 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0399639745193 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0172490469403 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191863239592 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02812672562 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175026183794 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.