The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map details plans for the renovation in the next year of Southwest Airport. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number of gates will greatly expand and there will be a variety of customer-facing facilities added including shops, a car hire, and an ATM.
The location of the departure and arrival entrances will remain the same but there are plans to install additional doors. Upon entering the airport, there is currently a single check-in and cafe. The future plan projects moving the check-in from the left to right side of the departure space in order to make room for a bag drop area and the repositioning of the cafe. The arrival section will affix a cafe, ATM, and car hire which necessitates expanding the size of the building.
Security, passport control, and customs will be unchanged, however, the future floor plan shows shops immediately upon exiting the security section for departures. The largest proposed alterations are replacing a walkway with a long sky train track and constructing 2 branching corridors that will enable flyers to reach more than twice as many gates (8 at the moment and 18 after renovations).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 80
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01025641026 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76962960091 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9768468883 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170306639205 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714696580014 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415459758911 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113650354708 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461295825428 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01025641026 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76962960091 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9768468883 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170306639205 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714696580014 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415459758911 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113650354708 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461295825428 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.