The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The diagram illustrates the plans of redevelopment Southwest Airport next year. We can see clearly that the airport will have a significant change after one year. Among that, the improvement of walkway into sky train is the most noticeable part in the whole project. They would be expanded into 2 branches of way with 18 gates in instead of 8 gates as now. People also plan to open the shops on the left area, which is between gate 1 and security passport control. For now, we only have check-in point on the left and cafe on the upper-right corner of departure area until they would be moved respectively to the right and lower-left corner next year. Besides, there would be more constructions in arrivals. People would fill the blank space by the café, ATM and car hire.
The only thing that might be kept unchanged as the plans shown is the layout of the Southwest Airport in the following year. There would be still 7 areas in the same orders of arrangement.
In conclusion, it would certainly be more convenient and user-friendly if the infrastructure was complimented as the project.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75263157895 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78086556604 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8227961956 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124904680569 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524904071503 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713085287123 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673401062588 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536814188404 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.