The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The figure picturizes the development of student accommodation buildings over 22-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the map dramatically changes in the rooms' position, function and expands the size of buildings.
According to the given data in the image, it is obvious that the student bedroom do make way for the garden and living room after 22 years. It is conspicuous that there is an area use only for student bedroom at the top of the building. Subsequently, the kitchen to the right of the map has witnessed the feature expansion, which is not only the kitchen but also become the social area.
In spite of the substantial difference during 22 years, there is no change in the student bedroom to the right at the bottom, the others next to the restroom and the bathroom. Moreover, it is an existence of the en-suite room to the right corner in Hallway. Finally, the acreage of garden is reduced and the car parking supplant for it which below the Hallway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 11
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town Norbiton and planned future development of the site 82
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8023255814 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70195630507 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3558208312 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927043742388 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405671066462 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038089812526 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591439330859 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468212674249 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.