The provided line chart illustrates the average yearly expenditure that consumers spent on mobile phone, national and global fixed line and services in America from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, while the spending on cell phone services rose significantly, the national fixed-line services witnessed a downward trend during the 10-year period. The amount of money spent on international fixed-line services was stable and had the lowest figure over the given time.
In the first year of the survey, the amount of money that the US residents spent on national fixed-line services was the highest one ($700) and more than the cell phone services about $500. However, year 2002 witnessed a considerable fall of the spending on national fixed-line services, at about $610 meanwhile the fee consumers paid for cell phone services climbed sharply by nearly $100. From 2003 to 2006, the mobile phone services’ expenditure went up continuously ($320-$500). The cost of national fixed-line services saw the opposite trend in the same given period, it plummeted steadily every year and have the same figure as the cell phone services in 2006. In 2007, the spending on mobile services increased significantly by $100 and reached the peak of approximately $730 in the final year. In 2008, the money spent on national fixed-line services dropped considerably to about $450 and this figure maintained in 2009. 2010 saw a dramatic fall of the national fixed-line services expenditure, at $400.
Regarding overseas fixed-line services, its cost in 2001 was $270 and this spending figure rose slightly during the 3 first year and America residents paid $320 for it in 2003. The figure maintained during the next given time and reached around $310 in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | HATHUYBINH | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... services expenditure, at 00. Regarding overseas fixed-line services, its cost i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09163346614 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79715892115 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474103585657 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5612661378 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404266064026 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179133228069 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610392884448 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266656236452 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979306360975 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.