The provided pie chart indicates the ratio of guests in four different tourist spots in the UK namely Theme Park Wildlife pars and zoos museums and galeries although historic houses and monuments in the result of 1999

Essay topics:

The provided pie chart indicates the ratio of guests in four different tourist spots in the UK namely:Theme Park, Wildlife pars and zoos, museums and galeries although historic houses and monuments in the result of 1999.

The provided pie chart indicates the ratio of guests in four different tourist spots in the UK namely:Theme Park, Wildlife pars and zoos, museums and galeries although historic houses and monuments in the result of 1999. As the first glance it is clear that, most people visited the theme parks and museum and galleries whereas lest popular attraction was wildlife parks and zoos.
As shown in the illustration, two most popular tourist attraction were theme parks and, museums and galleries which showed a difference of just 1% ( 38% and 37% respectively). About 16% people visited historic houses and monuments. The least visited was wildlife parks and zoos which were visited by 9% people.
I could be painly viewed that, among the attractions of theme parks almost half (47%) of the tourist choose to go to blackpool pleasure beach. Alton towers and pleasureland, Southport showed little difference (1%) in guests amount. Chessington world of adventure and legoland, windsor both had exactly same number of tourist, one tenth of total percentage.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-22 Assel Lesbayeva 92 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided pie chart indicates the ratio o...
^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies which showed a difference of just 1% 38% and 37% respectively. About 16% peop...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20118343195 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65731205868 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6841368313 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452212568441 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174852173724 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233593914433 0.0843802449381 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291225969089 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221853745251 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.