Reasons due to which individuals carry bicycles or cars to their workplace
The pie charts illustrate the information in the term of percentage regarding the reasons due to which individuals carry bicycles or cars to their workplace.
It can be apparently overviewed that comfort is the main reason because of which people like to carry cars to their organizations.
As can be witnessed from the given information that 40% of people drive to work because of comfort provided by the cars, whereas, 30 % people prefer cycling to work due to less pollution and the reasons of health, and fitness. Moreover, distance to work is the second reason because of which 21% people prefer to take cars to the work instead of a bicycle. Moreover, 15% of individuals prioritize bicycles over cars because of parking issues at the workplace.
Further demonstrating the key features, after no parking problems the other main reason to take the bicycle to work is no extra costs of petrol or diesel, whereas, 14% people use cars to take things to their workplaces. It is surprising to note that, 12% of individuals reckon that cycling is faster than driving whereas 14% think opposite to it. Additionally, driving is considered safe as compared to cycling by 13% of individuals.
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Many people prefer to stay in same type of work for whole their life whereas others prefer to change the type of work Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Reasons due to which individuals carry bicycles or cars to their workplace 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... cars to the work instead of a bicycle. Moreover, 15% of individuals prioritize bicycles...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...se of parking issues at the workplace. Further demonstrating the key features, after n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96984924623 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85092528839 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8603110625 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370007379659 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170219052226 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154470889682 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278445691289 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14900898602 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.