Road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The pictures describe the transformation to the entrance to a City Hospital during the period from 2007 to 2010.
Looking at the maps, it can be immediately seen that the area of City Hospital had undergone sinificant changes during the period. The most noticeable change that the road witnessed is the apperance of two roundabouts and the seperation of zone for car parking.
It's clear that while Ring Road and City Road remained unchanged in both shape and location, Hospital Road had been innovated with roundabouts placed in each end of the street to help traffic in the area safer. A newly-built bus station, which connected to two roundabouts by two novel roads, was erected in the West of Hospital Road to replace previous bus stops along that street.
Meanwhile, in 2007, the car park in the East of Hospital Road was available for both staff and resident. That was changed in next three years. While the whole area of old car parking was converted into staff car park only, another car park was contructed in the East of hospital for public demand.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sport center now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The table give information on customer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Road access to a city hospital 61
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the entrance to a City Hospital during the period from 2007 to 2010. Looking a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79781420765 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56382587968 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5709995691 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303349378631 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134641111811 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106300929093 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196686697684 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899027968913 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.