Scientist has been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this, what are the reasons for that and how people can be enc

Essay topics:

Scientist has been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this, what are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting the environment.

Some scientists advised to hold the usage of energy in our regular lives to protect the environment. Spite of, some people use highly produce heavy equipment and machineries that will be reason of devastating for future generation. While I agree people should care about environmental health effect.

Firstly, green environment create best atmosphere to spend healthy life. Furthermore, it can be seen that so many countries are being affected on account of producing heavy energy on regular basis that is being carried out the world into devastation. Meanwhile, there are so many disadvantages of pollution which damages the human body parts and living things such as, lungs, kidneys, stomach, plants, animals and many others.

Secondly, government should allocate separate places and form the criteria of those people that produces heavy pollution and cannot be banned by the government namely; business men and highly tax payer people, that eventually contribute for economic growth. Whereas, all unnecessary products which is being import and being made by the Pakistan that must be banned to stop pollution.

Thirdly, people should follow the rules and regulation that is concern to usage of energy, otherwise, it must be penalized and sanctions by the government. On the other hand, government ought to open institute to aware people about consequences of green world.

In conclusion, it is the responsibility of every human being to take care of green environment for save the planet but not to over look disadvantages of using energy.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-23 Muhammad Waleed Khan 78 view
2019-05-21 Muhammad Waleed Khan 78 view
Essays by user Muhammad Waleed Khan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: holding
Some scientists advised to hold the usage of energy in our regular live...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n of devastating for future generation. While I agree people should care about enviro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'create the best'.
Suggestion: create the best
...h effect. Firstly, green environment create best atmosphere to spend healthy life. Furth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver look disadvantages of using energy.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38114754098 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82403815144 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5226436804 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266808469996 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092987451446 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316646239359 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135921809784 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351332810047 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.