Should government or teachers be responsible for what is to be taught in schools?
Education plays a pivotal role in people's lives and it has become paramount to provide the right education to children. It has been a topic of hot debate whether the curriculum of school ought to be decided by the bureaucrats or the teachers. In my opinion, I deem that it should be the government's responsibility as they can take adept actions for the betterment of the wards.
To commence with, one of the prominent reasons why such a decision should be in the hands of the government is because they can take a universal step. In other words, a government can take the right action for the whole nation. This way, all children can have an equal level of education. For example, in a large country like India, it becomes very arduous to maintain the education level and during such times the government must ensure that students from different backgrounds get a chance to achieve an equal level of education. This can be a boon not only for the children but also the society as a whole.
Another major merit of having the government take the decision about the school subject is that they can stay updated with the latest norms of the world. When the government takes such a decision, they can alter the syllabus according to future projections and what would be beneficial for the children. To illustrate, the Indian government recently passed a law that language programming such as Python and JAVA should be taught to primary children because it is currently in vogue. On the other hand, if teachers would have taken this responsibility, they would work with diligence but would continue teaching the same things which will create a void in a child's life.
In recapitulation, having the government take the responsibility of deciding on the curriculum would ensure that there is no discrimination among the people and they learn what's best for their future. I deem that all governments around the globe should take a keen interest in school and try to broaden children's horizons as they are the future of the nation.
- The table shoes the percentage of young people who were working in different sectors in one country in 2005 and 2010 78
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 67
- In the future more people will choose to go on holidays in their own country and not travel abroad on holidays Do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries people move abroad for their work They have to leave their family and friends Do you think the benefits of this outweigh drawbacks 73
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...y opinion, I deem that it should be the governments responsibility as they can take adept a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had taken'?
Suggestion: had taken
...n vogue. On the other hand, if teachers would have taken this responsibility, they would work wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ination among the people and they learn whats best for their future. I deem that all ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 1.00243902439 1895% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 965.302439024 174% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82521489971 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74769114928 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 106.607317073 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515759312321 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8703511803 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348686226622 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12391020557 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845689907364 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220753193673 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373242776331 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.