Money in the country is earned by hardwork of the public and the government of the country. In my opinion it is the main role of government of the country which are poor to look after the residents of the country. This essay will discuss about why it is the responsibility of the government of the country to look after the nation’s necessities and what is the role of rich countries in connection with poor nations in relevance to food and studies.
To begin with, the government of a country has to look after all the developmental affairs of the country. It has the main role of providing people leaving in country with all the facilities and look after it’s needs. The residents which live in a nation pay taxes and leave in a place where the government of that particular country abides and makes the rules for them. The poor nation who could not afford to buy food or education, the government should makes and find ways to solve their problems. Example, research of harward university has proven that if the government helps in upbringing the nation’s people there will be more progress in country’s outcome and all the people living will be at peace and healthy.
The rich nations maintain ties with other poor nations, they provide goods, commodities and other required products depending on the demand and depending on what the nation who is receiving the goods in return, the rich nation to some extent can share the wealth to poor countries but it is the sole responsibility of the government of the own countries. For example, a research article of 2015 revealed that two nations working together can build a good relationship and increase the ties, but there should be a equal exchange of the products and goods required for both the countries to increase the GDP of the country. Some countries share a bond of friendship too but not everything can be shared for each of the people of the country who is poor.
To conclude, it the sole purpose of the government to fulfill the need of its people and provide them with food and education by finding ways rather than taking help from rich country.
- The charts below give information about world s spending world s population and consumption of resources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 73
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... increase the ties, but there should be a equal exchange of the products and good...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, after all, as to, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 372.0 196.424390244 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70698924731 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62135646414 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432795698925 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3316502726 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.916666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269185465414 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107853195678 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578348222682 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162107378605 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563115545535 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... increase the ties, but there should be a equal exchange of the products and good...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, after all, as to, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 372.0 196.424390244 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70698924731 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62135646414 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432795698925 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3316502726 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.916666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269185465414 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107853195678 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578348222682 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162107378605 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563115545535 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.