Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
The line graph gives the information about the regional household recycling ratio in the uk,france and germany from 2005 and 2015.
Overall,it seems that the uk and german showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while france experienced a downwards trend.
However, the given chart reveals that in 2005 the recycling rates of the uk and germany were nearly 35% and 20% respectively.germany percentage increased sharply throughout the period, exceeding france's rate in 2009 and reaching almost 60% in 2015. Meanwhile the percent of recycled rate in uk grew to 40% in 2007and remains stabilized till 2009.In addition, it suddenly rocketed to about 57% in 2011. Moreover it moderately climbed to approximately 61% in the end of the year 2015.
Whereas,in 2005 the regional household recycling rates of france was at about 50% comperatively highest among uk and germany.Furthermore, it swiftly decreased to around 34% in 2009. As well as, it slowly dropped to 30% in 2013 and quickly jumped to approx 39% in the end of the year 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-22 | Dhruv_21 | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-22 | Dhruv_21 | 11 | view |
| 2017-05-31 | mr.cuong95 | 11 | view |
| 2017-05-30 | mr.cuong95 | 11 | view |
- the line graphs below shows household recycling rates in three different counties between 2005 to 2015 78
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 11
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , france
...onal household recycling ratio in the uk,france and germany from 2005 and 2015. Over...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,france and germany from 2005 and 2015. Overall,it seems that the uk and german ...
^^^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...d germany from 2005 and 2015. Overall,it seems that the uk and german showed a s...
^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e france experienced a downwards trend. However, the given chart reveals that in...
^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...n 2009 and reaching almost 60% in 2015. Meanwhile the percent of recycled rate in uk grew...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...in 2007and remains stabilized till 2009.In addition, it suddenly rocketed to about...
^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...suddenly rocketed to about 57% in 2011. Moreover it moderately climbed to approximately ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...% in the end of the year 2015. Whereas,in 2005 the regional household recycling r...
^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...peratively highest among uk and germany.Furthermore, it swiftly decreased to around 34% in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0988372093 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11646888523 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6210410395 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0109477129206 0.215688989381 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00503600500555 0.103423049105 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00813230095508 0.0843802449381 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0076083790805 0.15604864568 5% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00854502576208 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.