Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully, whereas others think that it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some approach to planning their leisure time rather seriously compared to those who see it as time wasted. We can understand that planning economizes their time which would otherwise be wasted on thinking about things could be done. Unfortunately, it should be admitted that not always the plans for free time go as smoothly as planned. I think planning will pay off as long as planner will rip larger benefits from his/her decision.
On the one hand, free time arrangement comes with two obvious benefits and I agree. Firstly, a planner would enjoy the relaxed state of mind from knowing what he or she is definitely going to be engaged in which is actually a big time safer. Also, those who plan out their free time would avoid inconveniences that typically arise from not booking a seat or reserving ticket and etc. Usually, leisure time of most people fall into weekends when most seats and tables are reserved in advance and tickets for major shows are already sold out.
On the other hand, opponents of planners point out a single argument saying that one cannot plan out everything well before that time as there might be sudden arrangements and changes. Admittedly, not everything goes as it is planned in some moments. Following this, a person who pre arranged his/her pastime activities can be at disadvantage in terms of time he/she just simply wasted. Moreover, doing activities right at its own time would give a sense of joy and unexpectedness especially for those who seek advantures.
To sum up, while some regard planning as time spent for spree, I support those who plan out their free time as doing so would free them from such worries as sudden change of plan though some people may see it wrongly as waste of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... not booking a seat or reserving ticket and etc. Usually, leisure time of most people fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a pre'.
Suggestion: who is a pre
... some moments. Following this, a person who pre arranged his/her pastime activities can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, may, moreover, so, well, while, i think, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 5.60731707317 571% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79734219269 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51592646625 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1087794295 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344159114229 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131730511641 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730098253984 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237572152848 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637637999281 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.