The fact that playing video games is becoming a widespread concern in society these days. From my personal perspective, this matter has both favorable and unfavorable effects, but the negative sides outweigh the positive ones.
On the other hand, it is evident that playing video games will bring some advantageous results. Firstly, playing video games is an efficient recreational form that helps players release stress and pressure in life. These gamers are transferred into a virtual world that is more eye-catching and intriguing than real-world activities. Secondly, this type of entertainment can help to improve soft skills and expand our knowledge. For example, simulation games can be used to train potential pilots who are going to fly real planes in the future.
On the other hand, I am convinced that this issue actually has more prominent drawbacks. To begin with, sitting in front of the screen too long can lead to a lack of physical activity. This sedentary lifestyle can slow down metabolism, and regular players may suffer from obesity, diabetes, and gout. Furthermore, these games are addictive, and this can have negative impacts on academic performance. Addicted students tend to ignore homework or skip classes so that they can have more time for this temptation.
To summarize, considering the beneficial and adverse outcomes of this trend, I strongly believe that the demerits are more distinctive than the merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34061135371 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79676511028 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659388646288 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.1515643938 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0769230769 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200764599701 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742601526139 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870728701921 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113536346639 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732382992894 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.