Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
An increasing number of money has been spent on wildlife habitat. While a huge amount of different views on this issue that a greater time and cash should be served for human development. I partly agree with the thought of protecting humanity.
On the other hand, mankind should be prudent to the feral creature’s survival. Due to the fact that people are destroying animal’s living environments including seas, forests and the like, complexifying the ecosystem and leading to natural disasters so protecting the wildlife is also protecting humankind. Many kinds of animals were extinct because of the destruction of the human race while it could be precious aliments for people. It is our responsibility to revitalize the wildlife habitats.
On the one hand, wasting time and money on wild animals still brings some demerits for human beings. Firstly, the poverty and homeless rate have increased dramatically in many nations, so the government should invest more in them. For instance, Liberia is a country which is facing starvation and disease gravely but they do not have so many subventions. Sometimes, the inspiration of cultivating wild animals would make the deprived people Bewildered as their budget can barely afford their existence. Secondly, spending time in a wildlife medium can be time-consuming. Besides, wild beasts can assault people such as lions, bears, wolves and so on.
In conclusion, it is essential to protect wild animals for the reason that they are contributing a variety of benefits for mankind. However, the government should give the top priority to serving human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | Lê Vũ Minh | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3579766537 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90850240042 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9916153627 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26906760163 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784717910926 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586666474112 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157745491299 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813939287269 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.