Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that the more people use mobile phones and computers, the less they communicate directly with others. I completely agree with this statement, and in this essay I will show two reasons why.
First of all, people, especially the youngsters, now depend too much to their phones. They are addicted to social media like Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and open these apps whenever they can. This usually leads to lack of face to face conversations between people, since even when they are with each others but still keep their eye on the phones. A family meeting, for example, with all the family members participating in order to talk about their days, but then everyone just pulls out their smart phones and swipe it until the meeting is over.
Secondly, with mobile phones and computers, it is easy to find and contact friends or colleagues through online messages. Because of no eye-to-eye contact, people feel more confident and talk freely, and gradually lose the ability to communicate directly. For instance, a group of people with the same interest, they can chat with others endless on the internet, but then only feel awkward when they finally hang out, decide to avoid talking as much as possible, lead to lack of proper conversations.
In conclusion, people are likely to talk less to each other as long as they depend on their phones and computers, since they are addicted to social media and contact with others through the internet rather than have a real conversation.
- as countries develop their population tend to live individually small family In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 67
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 83
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95256916996 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.511415298 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6887780437 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19844866653 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828844723462 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662190941995 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129918794996 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546452254353 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.