Spending on Public Transport per week by age, UK, 2003
The bar chart reveals information on the amount of money spending on public transport among five selected age groups in the UK by the year 2003. Unist are measured in pounds sterling.
From an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the consumption of different means of transport by Bristish in 2003. In fact, the figure for people aged under 30 using Taxis appreared to be by far the largest one, with over 6 pounds sterling per week which was followed by the corresponding figures of people aged 30 - 30 and those aged 50 - 65, with almost 6 pounds sterling per week and approximately 5.8 pounds sterling per week, respectively.
Remarkably, the figure for British people aged 30 - 50 stood using Bus stood at the highest level, with roughly 2 pounds sterling per week which was folloews by that of people aged under 30 and those aged 50 - 65. Actually, these figures were found to be about 1.8 pounds sterling and around 1.6 pounds sterling per week, in that order. Conversely, the figure for Bristish people aged over 75 taking public transport was witnessed to be the lowest one, with nearlt 1.7 pounds sterling per week by Taxis and just over 0.5 pounds sterling per week by Bus.
It is interesting to note that the figure fo Bristish people travelling by Rail ranged from around 0.5 pounds sterling per week to almost 4 pounds sterling per week. Overall, the figure for people aged under 30 using public transport was significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the vast majority of age groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Sang Sang Sang | 80 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie chart gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 73
- The relationship between age and crime 2002 Types of property crime in the UK 2002 93
- Spending on Public Transport per week by age UK 2003 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, if, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82954545455 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60515910769 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473484848485 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2720169997 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364780371626 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167886772458 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976589911431 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26478507305 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314235682851 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.