Summarises the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad from 1983 to 1992
The diagram provides information about how many people contracted diarrhea in Mashhad throughout the period from 1983 to 1992. Overall, the amount of people who suffer diarrhea in Mashhad had a tremendous fluctuation over a period of 9 years.
It is clear that there were dramatic changes in the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad shown on the graph. Whereas the number of people who suffered diarrhea in 1992 increased remarkably, the remaining years saw diarrhea cases went down.
In 1983, the quality data of diarrhea cases stood at 100 people, and it remained steady at around 100 cases in the next 2 years. Over the following 2 years, it doubled and reach 200 cases in 1987.
However, this upward trend dropped in 1988 to the same level as they were in 1983 and 1984. This was followed by a significant surge as figures nearly quadruple into 400 cases in the year of 1989, which was slightly dropped around 350 cases in 1990 and 1991. Ultimately, diarrhea cases in Mashhad were totally improved and there weren't any cases by the year 1992.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-31 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | oreooquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | Selena17_ | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | sarahnguyennn | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | Safarbek | 100 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...Mashhad were totally improved and there werent any cases by the year 1992.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75956284153 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41038740704 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1226924671 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454578684524 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185338778687 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104791610783 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262584129584 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735082485775 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.