a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005
The bar chart illustrates data on the percentage of users connecting to the internet in four types of locations between 1998 and 2004
Overall, the percentage of people who used the internet at home and in library remained relatively constant, while the figures for access at work and college decreased. Home was by far the most common place where users accessed the internet.
In 1998, the proportion of users accessing the internet from home was the highest, at around 54%. By contrast, the rate for those who used it at the library was the lowest point of exactly 10%. Approximately 27% of users connected to the internet at work, compared to precisely 20% at college.
The percentage of internet users gaining access from their houses rose to about 55% in 2004, after a decline of about 8% in 2000. On the other hand, the figures for access at work and collage decreased to exactly 10% and around 18% respectively over the period. Users accessing the internet at the library increased about 5% from 1998 to 2000 and then dipped sightly in 2002, where it remained steady throughout 2004
- the bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The two maps below show in before and after the construction of some tourist facilitiessummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005 77
Comments
c
Ambiance at this salon's ambiance is trendy and sophisticated, creating a chic and upscale space. The staff is professional and attentive, making sure I was comfortable and happy with my haircut. I left the salon feeling like a million bucks, and I can't wait to return for my next hair adventure! https://premiumbarbershop.com/969-3rd-ave/
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84574468085 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54330421562 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5761438111 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252046016406 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12532727027 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580075689564 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158021530195 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505732181287 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.