The table and the chart below compares the average amounts of money spent by students while studying in four different countries in 2005.
Both the table and the chart illustrates how students in four nations distributed their money into 3 types of needs such as accommodation, tuition and living costs per week in 2005. Overall, the table shows that except for accommodation, students in country A spent the largest amount of money for their needs in comparison to other nations. Likewise, the table presents that country A had the first place in terms of average weekly spending.
According to the bar chart, in all countries, living costs were higher than other needs' expenses whereas accommodation had the lowest outlay except for country D (with nearly $150). Moreover, country A became the most expensive place where all needs per week were paid with the highest price apart from its accommodation (about $170). Instead, the first rank of accommodation expenditure came from country B, with just over $200.
In regards to the table, the expense of living in country D was twice more than in country A, with $429 and $845 respectively. In addition, $782 is the amount of money needed to afford a living per week in country B, which is higher than country C by $257. This put country C in the third position in comparison to other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | PHAM ANH THU | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 84
- the chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 84
- The bar chart shows the relative electricity consumption and cost per year of various household devices Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer explaining the data and making comparisons where relevant 90
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs compared" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'comparing' or 'to be compared'.
Suggestion: comparing; to be compared
...largest amount of money for their needs compared to other nations. Likewise, the table p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
... from country B, with just over 00. In regards to the table, the expense of living in cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, likewise, moreover, so, third, whereas, apart from, except for, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83084577114 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68621704002 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5947700417 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262507269026 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110540357855 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761427700401 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181285051528 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117358249669 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.