The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table indicated the sources of the police budget while the charts illustrate how money was given out in an area of Britain over two years (2017, 2018).
Overall, the police budget mainly came from National Government sources. It is also noticeable that spending on salaries for officers and staff accounted for the highest proportion.
According to the table, in 2018, the police budget increased by about £15 million compared with 2017. The National Government was the biggest funder in both years, the amount of money saw a rise from £175.5 million in 2017 to £177.8 million in 2018. There was a significant increase in local taxes source from £91.2 million in 2017 to £102.3 million in 2018 while the money that came from other sources increased minimally by £0.5 million.
The employees’ wages saw a slight rise of 6% in 2018. The spending on technology demonstrated a different pattern, climbing to 14% in the same year. In both years, the proportion of buildings and transport stayed almost unchanged at 17%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woollen goods
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The diagram below shows the steps of processing cocoa beans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- The charts show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57053301041 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2475214369 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253772165375 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973125350085 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905750731685 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152468877635 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102882494568 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.