The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two figures illustrate the changes that have taken place in the police budget of a specific region in Britain in two years 2017 and 2018. Specifically, the pie chart gives information on the way these budgets were spent whereas the table shows the origin of this money.
Overall, in both two years, the financial plan primarily came from the national government, and it was mostly spent on paying salaries for officers and staff. In addition, in 2017 and 2018, the total budget exceeded 300 million euro each year.
Regarding the table, over 175 million euros of the financial plan came from the contribution of the national government each year, making it the largest source of income of the region. Moreover, 91.2 million euros were generated from local taxes in 2017, which increased by nearly 10 million euros one year later. Finally, there was a slight rise in the total income of other sources, such as grants, from 38 million in 2017 to 38.5 million euros in 2018.
Turning to the pie chart, over half of the budget was used for officers and staff’s salaries. The figure was much lower in the expenditure on technology and buildings and transport. While over the 2 years, the spending on buildings and transport remained unchanged, at 17%, there was a small increase in the reported figure for technology, rising by 6% in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 73
- Some students choose to work or travel after leaving school and before going to university Many people however say that working experience is more useful in adult life than travel Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer a 61
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et exceeded 300 million euro each year. Regarding the table, over 175 million eu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85217391304 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47450516334 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8520309583 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254294511869 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980582119634 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716479978849 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153783957272 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812468032566 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.