The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average monthly variation in prices of three kinds of metal, including copper, nickel, and zinc, over the course of the year 2014.
Overall, throughout the year 2014, while the change rate in the cost of copper and nickel showed a decrease, zinc witnessed a slight increase in its price rate. Additionally, the chart showed a fluctuation in the rank of nickel and zinc.
Regarding nickel, in the first half of the year 2014, Nickel started from 6% in January exhibited a significant decrease and reached 1% in March. Continually falling, three months after that, nickel was standing at the bottom of the chart, at -3 in June. Quickly it rebounded again in the next six months, despite a fall in October, and displayed 1% change in its price in December 2014.
Enter the variation in the cost of copper and zinc. Both these two metals were less pronounced compared with nickel. Started at 2% in January, copper start decreasing the next five months and stopped at about -0.5% in May. Then, it increased and reach 1.5% at the end of 2014. Meanwhile, zinc was the metal that had the lowest modification in its price at the beginning, then it increased to 3% in February and quickly declined the next 4 months, at -1 in June. In the end, this element demonstrated a significant change when standing in the top one of three metals that witnessed the highest increment in December 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 89
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76016260163 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57627703949 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532520325203 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8394512554 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176771066481 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693418914143 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568644638634 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132870515976 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514164211793 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76016260163 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57627703949 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532520325203 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8394512554 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176771066481 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693418914143 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568644638634 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132870515976 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514164211793 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.