The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The table details the police budget from different sources while the pie charts illustrate how much money was allocated for three purposes, measured in two years: 2017 and 2018
Overall, the police budget in that area increased after two years, and the national government remained the main source. As for spending, the amount of money paid for salaries of officers and staff outnumbered spending on technology, buildings and transport.
In 2017, the total police budget of the area surveyed was over 300 million pounds, which rose slightly by under 20 million pounds in the following year. Among the three sources, the national government contributed 175.5 and 177.8 million pounds in two respective years, a trivial rise. The amount of money raised from local taxes also climbed considerably by more than 10 million pounds to reach 102.3 million pounds in 2018. Other sources (such as grants) accounted for the smallest part, at around 38 million pounds in both two years.
About budgetary allocation, spending on salaries for officers and staff, despite a fall from 75% to 69%, made up the largest part. Recording an adverse trend was spending on technology which rose from 8% to 14%, but was still lowest. Spending on buildings and transport was unaltered at 17% in each year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people enjoy change and look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to remain the same and do not like any changes Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons and relevant examples to support your answer You should write at leas 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10426540284 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47980092684 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601895734597 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8046863041 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216394032628 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07996797079 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814532587153 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152386322632 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102606703787 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.