The table and pie chart gives information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas
The given pie graph illustrates the percentage of different people from distinctive nations that constitute the Australian population, while the table illustrates the density of people with different nationalities in urban area and the outskirts.
Overall, the native citizens account for the largest portion of the total population, as opposed to people from Netherland. It is also noticeable that most people have a preference to live in cities instead of the suburbs.
Concerning the proportion of people with various nationalities, the percentage of native citizens account for 73% of the total population. For the figure for people form other regions residing in Australia, it makes up 14% of the total population which is double the figure for British in Australia. Meanwhile the proportion of New Zealander, Chinese and Dutch living in Australia, constitutes 3%, 2% and 1% of the total correspondingly.
Turning to the density of people in city and countryside, Chinese account for the largest proportion with the figure being recorded at 99% city residents and only 1% of Chinese residing in the outskirt. In the second position, it is New Zealander with 90% of city dweller which is higher than the proportion of people in countryside by 80%, followed by British and Dutch with the figure being recorded at 89% and 83% respectively and the remaining proportion living in suburb. Whereas 80% of Australian resides in urban area and 20% living in the countryside.
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 You should write at least 150 words 73
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 89
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29661016949 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.046630796 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474576271186 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6431386548 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.888888889 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104553121286 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452361663966 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695379335064 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775827001326 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880992758695 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.