The table and pie charts show the number of research students in Australia universities in 2001 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The table and pie charts illustrates information about the quantity of students doing research in Australian University within two separate year 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the majority of domestic students selected research programs in 2001. In addition, there was an upward trend in the number of both domestic and foreign students participating in research programs during a decade surveyed.
There was a slight growth in the quantity of local students following research programs, from 33,675 to 39,488 while that of foreign students doing research almost trebled, from 5,192 to 14,593.
In 2001, the proportion of male foreign students was over two time as high as that of female foreign students with 10% and 4% respectively, while the proportion of male domestic students and the counterparts were equal at 43%.
In 2010, the proportion of male foreign students and the counterparts significantly climbed, correspondingly from 10% to 12%, 4% to 15%. In contrast, the majority of domestic students, (73%) pursued research programs, in which the percentages of male and female local students were 35% and 39% respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-02 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 61 | view |
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 67
- Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe 11
- The graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China Japan and the United States Value is estimated in term of australian dollars billions 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...espondingly from 10% to 12%, 4% to 15%. In contrast, the majority of domestic stud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95627134906 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9807740598 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221531502079 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124201766712 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840662479708 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142113138722 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864259444132 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.