The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table illustrates the figures of workers and industry sites in England and Wales in the timescale of 50 years between 1851 and 1901.
Overall, it can be seen that the total number of factories increased over the time surveyed while the number of workers witnessed a downward trend. In addition, male workers were much more than female employees in the period of 50 years.
Look at the table for more detail, in the course of 10 years from 1851 to 1861, although the amount of factories were among the least compared to other years later, the number of workers were massive, total at 477,100 people and 291,780 workers, respectively. In this period, men were the main labourforce in the economy, at 287,100 employees in 1851, which was roughly 100,000 workers higher than that of women.
It is obvious that in the surveyed time from 1871 to 1901, the number of factories observed a dramatic increase from 227 in 1861 to 721 in 1881, which was also the highest number of factories throughout the period. Nevertheless, the number of employees in this time decreased
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-13 | Thu Mo | 61 | view |
2019-12-12 | dknk | 73 | view |
2019-12-03 | Spring2019 | 78 | view |
2019-11-21 | Sahejpreet | 84 | view |
2019-11-02 | marin123 | 73 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 11
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of employees in this time decreased
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, nevertheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48616208047 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2455532034 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325173810877 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144705548074 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738548114794 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197971983793 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670368957559 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.