The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table illustrates the count of male, female employeer, and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
In overall, men's population is dominant throughout the period than female, and the number of factories is massively raising. An increasing number of industries are inversely proportional to the mean count of employees.
The men population is 287,100 in 1851 which is the excessive value throughout the period, but 10 years after it is rapidly reduced to 131,780 whereas the factories number were increased 225 to 227. After a decade of reduction in the male worker is still continuous, whereas the industries development peaked by nearly 200%. The steady deduction is ongoing till 1901 and have just 31,000 men worker by the end. In the case of factories it expanded its count to 721 by the next 10 year period, after a 20-year count of the worker as well as factories reduced.
Again, Female workers are 190,000 while starting but the downfall of the workers is there for 30 years and the count is reduced to 60,000. For the next half, every decade 10,000 peoples are deducted, while having just 30,000 total women working for a factory. Total count of fully dependent on men and women so is reducing its value within the entire period.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are problems? Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 73
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...worker is still continuous, whereas the industries development peaked by nearly 200%. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89252336449 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54792906646 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6151923071 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170724560651 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807719558328 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126125938124 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1627576261 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166474888989 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.