The table of data represent the average distance in miles for different modes of transport for each person in England in 1985 and 2000.
Overall, walking, cycling and using of local bus lost popularity at the end of the given period, while usage indicators of others ways of travelling increased.
With respect to the year 1985, 3199 miles out of total 4740 were travelled by car that rose to 4806 miles out of total 6475 in the year of 2000. The second most common way of travelling in the table for these two years was for others transport modes which were far less than that of cars (450 miles) and increased to 585 miles in 2000. The lowest figure in 1985 seem was for travel by taxi, standing at a mere 13 miles, however, escalated to a value of 42 miles by 2000.
Meanwhile, local bus was one of the most popular transport mode (429 miles) in the year of 1985 but lost its position almost twice (274 miles) at the end of researching period. The same trend was followed by walking and cycling as in 1985, 255 miles were travelled by a British citizen on foot and 52 miles by bicycle, and their distance of both decreased slightly in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, as for, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45497630332 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25155896118 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54028436019 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.2159340074 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18847344718 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103117597291 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506756570472 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125644564409 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641945239786 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.