The table compares the proportion of expenditure on various products and service spent by Irish, Italian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish in 2002.
Overall, residents in all five countries spent much more on food, drinks, and tobacco than other items, and leisure and education had the lowest percentage of spendings. Furthermore, Turkey had the largest proportion of expenditure on the aforementioned items, while Italy ranked first in terms of budget for clothing and footwear.
34.14% of Turkish consumer purchase was Food, drinks and tobacco products, followed by the Irish figure, at 28.19%. Similarly, 4.35% of the Turkish budget went on Leisure and Education, which was the highest among nations. Italian spent 9% on clothing and footwear, significantly higher than their counterparts.
Compared to Turkey and Italy, Sweden saw the lowest percentage of expenditure on Food, drinks, tobacco, accounting for 15.77%, and clothing and footwear, making up 5.4%. Meanwhile, in relation to the remaining categories, Spain spent the least out of five countries, with merely 1.98%.
- In many countries, truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators. What are the causes of truancy and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community? 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Spanish, Swedish and Turkish in 2002. Overall, residents in all five countries...
^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erparts. Compared to Turkey and Italy, Sweden saw the lowest percentage of expe...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on Food, drinks, tobacco, accounting for 15.77%, and clothing and footwear, makin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59756097561 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83339165469 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6310647801 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0612817373467 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026044048412 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287135876962 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405763310316 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215737870262 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.