The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table compares the percentages of pupils who struggled with different educational difficulties in two distinct primary schools in the years 2005 and 2015.
It is clear that school A had by far the larger number of pupils with different educational problems compared to school B in both years. Noticeably, while school A saw a decrease in the percentages of children struggling with those problems, figures for school B rose considerably over the same period.
In 2005, school A’s students experienced difficulties about concentration in lessons and following instructions accounted for 40% and 42% respectively. In the same year, in school B, the proportions of children who had the similar problems were only 15% and 6%. The other different educational problems made up from 22% to 35% in school A, and the figures for school B were from 7% to 14%.
Over the following 10 years, in 2015, overall, school A managed to reduce the numbers of students with these difficulties. Students attending school A with problems about concentration in lessons and following instructions decreased to 18%. By contrast, school B saw a dramatic increase in the percentages of children with education difficulties like spelling and following instructions, these figures doubled, from 5% to 10%, and from 6% to 12% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 10%, and from 6% to 12% respectively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2654028436 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18697033977 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5805847529 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260087600765 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12409126138 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522523782288 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181799078052 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489099274227 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.