Information on the students who took six different majors at an Australian university in 2011 is depicted in the given table.
Overall, it is clear that there was no direct co-relation. on the subject students preferred based on the three classifications.
As per the table, out of the total enrolments to humanities, science and education, majority were females. Enrolments to humanities stood first, with 72%, followed by education, with 68%. Their rates of enrolments to science and physics were 53 and 56 respectively. The less preferred subject were information technology ( 17%) and engineering (15%).
It is also clear from the table that both the non- native English speakers and overseas students of the university preferred scienc and technology more than humanities and education. When around 38% to 49% of the former group opted for either science or technology, this range was between 31% and 56% in case of foreign students. When less than a quarter of overseas students opted humanities and education, the rate of non-native English speakers who opted the same had not crossed one-sixth of the total enrolments.
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011 78
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 89
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 78
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent majors at an Australian university in 2011 is depicted in the given table. ...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...r that there was no direct co-relation. on the subject students preferred based on...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed based on the three classifications. As per the table, out of the total enrol...
^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rred subject were information technology 17% and engineering 15%. It is also c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28333333333 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9688662258 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6574741785 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146601504999 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583536456162 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991625979302 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115273803386 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129349879348 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.