The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The table shows data about underground rail networks in six major cities.

Overall, the table compares the six network in term of their age, size, and the number of people who use them each year. It is clear that three oldest underground system are larger and serve significantly more passengers than the newer systems.

The London underground is the oldest system, having opened in 1863. It is also the largest system, with 394 kilometers of route. The second largest largest system, in Paris is only about half the size of the London underground, with 199 kilometers of the route. However, it serves more people per year. While only third in terms of size, the Tokyo system is easily the most used, with 1927 million passengers per year.

Of the three newer networks, the Washington DC is the most extensive with 126 kilometers of route, compared to only 11 kilometers and 28 kilometers for the Kyoto and Los Angeles system. The Los Angeles network is the newest, having opened in 2001, while Keyoto network is the smallest and serves only 45 million passengers per year.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: largest
...ith 394 kilometers of route. The second largest largest system, in Paris is only about half the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'largest the largest'.
Suggestion: largest the largest
...ith 394 kilometers of route. The second largest largest system, in Paris is only about half the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88586956522 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41719555628 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6203003274 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117895775989 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595961765071 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580886680447 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994494172666 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696188410037 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.