The table below gives information about the values (NZ$) of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the income that kiwi fruit brought from New Zealand to 5 different countries namely Japan, China, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia in 3 years 2010, 2011, 2012.
Overall, on the first and the second rank were Japan and China which was on the rise as well as Russia while Mexico and Saudi Arabia was truly opposite.
More over, in 2010, the kiwi exportation in Japan was 271 million dollars, which increased to 287 million dollars in 2011 and 325 dollars in 2012. Similarly, the kiwi fruit exported in China which went up slightly from 74.9 million dollars in 2010 to 84.8 million dollars in 2011 and 94 millions dollars in 2012. Not only China and Japan but Russia was also on a slightly increase too. Furthermore, there was 968 thousand dollars of kiwi exportation in this country that rose to 1.585 million dollars in 2011 and 2.4 million dollars in 2012.
In addition, the kiwi fruit exported in Mexico and Saudi Arabia had mainly fluctuated. Furthermore, the value of kiwi fruit in Mexico in 2010 was 6 millions, while there was only 290 thousand dollar of kiwi exported in Saudi Arabia. In the next two years, the export to Mexico market dropped to about 3.3 million dollars. Similarly, there was about 208 thousand dollars of kiwi exportation plummeted in Saudi Arabia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-07-17 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages out outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... China and Japan but Russia was also on a slightly increase too. Furthermore, there was 968 thousan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Saudi Arabia. In the next two years, the export to Mexico market dropped to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79372197309 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32255828371 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47533632287 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6517881739 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170616685966 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909169816567 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609369571482 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118970542102 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798969750026 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.