The table below gives information about the weekly consumption of ordinary milk and butter and high and low fat alternatives of milk and butter among different age groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai

The assigned tabular chart compares the weekly consumption of two breeds of milk and butter in four descdent age groups in one European country.

It's clear that milk consumption was increased continuely accompanied with the age grews, as well as the butter consumption with inferior three groups, the last age group saw a sharp decline compared with the predecedent group. Futhermore, the figures show vary proportion of two breeds of milk and butter(full fat and low fat) consumption in different age groups.

The youngest age group under 25 years accounted for the minoriy proportion in milk consumption with a figure of 1200ml. While the oldest age group beyond 65 years contirbuted the most milk consumption with a figure of 1900ml. followed by the age groups between 45 and 65 years with a figure of 1670ml. The age group between 26 and 45 years have a familar consumption compared with age group 45 to 65 years. While the figures show a moderately different in preference in full fat and low fat in youngest group and 45 to 65 years age group, all were nearly 50%, oldest group and 25 to 45 years age group have a strong preference in low fat milk. To be species, 20%,30% in full fat and 80%,70% in low fat respectively.

Ages between 45 and 65 constitude the most consumption in butter, with a figure of 60g, approximately double number than consumption of oldest group. Age between 26 and 45 was the third important consumer of butter, with a figure of 19g. While the youngest group only need 12g butter each week. In the meantime, youngest group prefer full fat than low fat, which are opposite of ages between 26 and 45. Ages beyong 45 show had the same favour in full fat butter and low fat butter.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lk consumption with a figure of 1200ml. While the oldest age group beyond 65 years co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...lk consumption with a figure of 1900ml. followed by the age groups between 45 and 65 yea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the youngest'.
Suggestion: in the youngest
...t in preference in full fat and low fat in youngest group and 45 to 65 years age group, all...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the oldest'.
Suggestion: , the oldest
... 65 years age group, all were nearly 50%, oldest group and 25 to 45 years age group have...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the oldest'.
Suggestion: of the oldest
...ximately double number than consumption of oldest group. Age between 26 and 45 was the th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nsumer of butter, with a figure of 19g. While the youngest group only need 12g butter...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the youngest'.
Suggestion: , the youngest
...ed 12g butter each week. In the meantime, youngest group prefer full fat than low fat, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70431893688 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61296895491 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41196013289 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3193198015 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296206383398 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144141641439 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562485831489 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233378225717 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259320205721 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

'increaed continuously' rather not 'increased continuly'
'in the lower three groups' rather not 'with the inferior three groups'
'preceding' rather not 'predecesdent'
'to be specific ' rather not 'to be species'