The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the percentages of expenditure that consumers spend on three types of products and services in several nations in the year 2002.
It can be seen clearly from the table, while food/drinks/tobacco was the most popular in Turkey and Ireland, consumers in Italy mainly gave preference to clothing and footwear. The leisure/education category had the lowest percentages in the table.
In Turkey, the figure for food/drinks/tobacco was at the highest position, at 32,14%, which doubled than that in Sweden and Italy. However, the first rank belonged to Italia with 9% of people buying clothing/footwear. In terms of leisure/education, the proportions in all countries were less than 5%.
The percentages of national consumer expenditure in Sweden were the lowest (15,77% for food/drinks/tobacco and 5,4% for clothing/footwear). At the same time, consumers in Spain only spent 1.98% on leisure/education, which was approximately 1% less than other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- animal human poverty health agree disagree 73
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009 95
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65986394558 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.97912085125 2.65546596893 150% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4725887482 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840967719602 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390199896128 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518697441136 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653832001265 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060239868425 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.