The table illustrates the proportion of national expenditure in five various nations in 2002.
Overall, the percentage of food, drink and tobacco accounted for the largest in all countries, as opposed to leisure and education, which had the least proportion. Besides, Turkey was the country having the overall percentage higher than other contries.
As can be seen from the table, Turkey had the highest percentage of food, drink and tobacco with 32.14 percent as well as leisure and education with 4.35 percent, which was twice as much as the Ireland one. The proportion of food, drink and tobacco was 28.91 percent, making it the second highest in all countries. The percentage of clothing and footwear of Ireland was 6.43 which was almost same as Turkey.
In contrast, Italy was the contry which had the highest propotion of clothing and footwear with 9 percent while this proportion of Sweden accounted for the lowest with 5.40 percent. The percentage of leisure and education of these two countries was nearly similar with 3.20 percent for Italy and 3.22 percent for Sweden. The percentage of leisure and education that consumer spending in Spain was the lowest with 1.98 percent, as regards the percentage of food, drink and tobacco in Sweden with 15.77 percent.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 80
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school 61
- The diagram below shows the environment issues raised by a product over its life cycle Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od, drink and tobacco was 28.91 percent, making it the second highest in all cou...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k and tobacco was 28.91 percent, making it the second highest in all countries. ...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure and education of these two countries was nearly similar with 3.20 percent for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, well, while, as regards, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0956937799 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52576295242 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459330143541 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3922676163 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110226618611 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663554153099 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884004440441 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111923781768 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108789757731 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.