The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the proportion of national expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three types of consumer items in 2002. Overall, the category of consumer goods that all countries spent most on was food, drinks tobacco, which was three-time higher than other consumer goods. The lowest spending has been seen in the category of leisure and education in all five countries. The outlay of Turkey was generally higher than the others four countries.
In terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, turkey spent the most at 32.14%. the expenditure of Ireland was high (28.91% compared to Sweden, which spent the least (15.77%). Spain and Italy spent 18.80% and 16.36 respectively. On the other hand, the lowest expenditure was on leisure and education, accounting for under 5% in all countries. Turkey spent most of these items at just 4.35% of their national expenditure, which is around double that of Spain(1.98%).
Clothing and footwear was the third category of consumer goods and outlays those items between 9% in Italy and 5.40% in Sweden. The national sending in this area for the remaining countries averaged around 6.5%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...bacco, turkey spent the most at 32.14%. the expenditure of Ireland was high 28.91% ...
^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remaining countries averaged around 6.5%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14516129032 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55122681037 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7963183374 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818600702284 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328935602732 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367067707455 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625077086693 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406330111291 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.