The given table illustrates how often adults in one European country searched the internet during the period from 2006 to 2010.
From the initial observation, the percentage of grown-up people in the mentioned country who were online daily accounted for the highest, whereas the figure for those who consumed less than 3 times witnessed an opposite trend.
As can be seen from the table that the number of daily adult internet users had tendency of increasing gradually between 2006 and 2010. This percentage in 2010 was nearly doubled comparing to that in 2006 from 35% to 60%. On the contrary, the number of people who never used the internet or was online less than 3 times per month decreased significantly in the period shown from 30 percent to 19 percent and from 13% to 5% respectively
Refering to the frequency of using Internet by adults weekly, this figure remained stable in 3 first years (2006, 2007, 2008 with 16%) before experiencing a downward trend to 15% in 2009 and 13 percent in 2010.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030 61
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84971098266 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54400937395 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.979998347 43.030603864 281% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.8 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299099434167 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176437791798 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120437224407 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192219699571 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121644798622 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.